"Locksley Hall"
by Alfred Lord
Tennyson,
1842
For I dipt into the future, far as human eye
could see,
Saw the Vision of the world, and all the
wonder that would be...
Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and
the battle-flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of man, the Federation
of the world.
There the common sense of most shall hold a
fretful realm in awe,
And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt
in universal law.
The roots of the
United Nations -- the most visible part of the new global management system
-- might be compared to the many deep and spreading roots of a tenacious
vine. Some of the roots are short and shallow. Others are long and deep,
firmly imbedded in powerful social, political and financial institutions
in Europe and North America, which -- for various reasons -- shared Lord
Tennyson's vision of a "federation of the world."
The tangled roots
of this vine spread beneath the surface of public life until 1945, when
delegates from 50 countries met in San Francisco to sign the UN Charter.
Communist spy,
Alger Hiss,
co-authored that founding charter and served as the first acting UN
Secretary-General. This initial
glimpse of the global agenda should have raised a big red flag. But our
war-torn world was already blinded by the well-publicized vision of a peaceable
planet "lapt in universal law." Who dared oppose such a noble purpose?
Actually, many Americans
did see the sign posts along the way, but their warnings were drowned out
by the mainstream media's resounding praise. Small wonder! The 25 main U.S.
newspapers had been bought by the banking goliath,
J. P. Morgan -- one of the stronger stems in the vine's tangled root
system.
The young vine grew
fast and its branches spread throughout the world. The signs of political
and social compromise multiplied. It was no secret that each consecutive
socialist Secretary General -- Trygve Lie (from Norway but recommended
by Russia), Dag Hammersjold (Sweden),
U Thant (Burma), Kurt Waldheim (Austria), etc. -- sympathized with Communism
and helped build an imposing web of international declarations and treaties
("soft" laws) that would overrule constitutional rights and domestic laws
in America.
For decades
only Communist leaders would fill the UN's highest military
post, Under-Secretary-General for Political and
Security Council Affairs. Fourteen of the fifteen men who held this
vital post up until 1995 (and probably into the new century [2])
represented the USSR. The one exception was Dragoslav Protitich, a Communist
from Yugoslavia. So when American soldiers fought Communism in Korea and
Vietnam in partnership with the UN, the top UN military leaders were Communists.
No wonder American soldiers fought two futile and deadly wars.
How could the public be so deceived? Part of
the answer lies in subtle power of gradualism -- the incremental
steps that function like the proverbial frog in the pot of slow-heating
water. You become so used to gradual change that you hardly notice the next
step.
Just as important
is the grand
vision
of global peace, which burns in the heart of many idealists who
have learned to hate war. These two -- vision and gradualism -- serve
to both motivate and deceive the masses at the same time. Of course,
many of the
leaders who utilize these strategies have more totalitarian goals in mind.
That quest began long for
Alfred Lord Tennyson
penned his visionary poem, Locksley Hall. History points to monumental
feats such as the
Tower of Babel, the vast Hittite, Babylonian and Persian civilizations and, later, the Greek,
Roman, Byzantine and Muslim empires. In more modern times the world watched
with awe as "civilized" nations such as Russia and Germany sacrificed personal
freedom and millions of lives on their altars to Soviet and Nazi dreams
of totalitarian socialism.
Hindsight helps us trace the early, incremental steps toward
a world government, and we can now look back at a foundation laid by an
eclectic blend of socialist visionaries, global-minded financiers, communist
revolutionaries, secret societies, New Age leaders, wealthy capitalist and
tax-exempt foundations primarily in Great Britain and the USA. Long
before the United Nations became an official organ under socialist leadership,
that early vision had spread through all
the main institutions.
As Marilyn Ferguson wrote in The Aquarian Conspiracy,
"Broader than
reform, deeper than revolution, this benign conspiracy for a new human
agenda has triggered the most rapid cultural realignment in history....
There are legions of conspirators. They are in corporations, universities
and hospitals, on the faculties of public schools, in factories and
doctors' offices, in state and federal agencies, on city councils and
the White House staff, in state legislatures, in volunteer organizations,
in virtually all arenas of policy-making in the country.... They have
coalesced into small groups in every town and institution."
[3]
pages 23-24
To
fulfill this dream of a New World Order that would serve the grandiose economic
and social interests of its early visionaries, two steps were essential:
-
Establish an efficient global management system that
would join the nations of the world through processes that would appear "democratic" and would produce compliance with specific sets
of goals and standards.
-
Use this
management system to mold minds, undermine sovereignty, establish social
solidarity and train a mobile global workforce through --
migration,
a
global economy
and a
global welfare
system).
A
uniform worldwide education
system that would standardize both social "learning" and work skills
everywhere.
Control
of the mainstream
media
and other propaganda channels.
Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in
Tragedy and Hope,
"There grew up in the 20th century a power structure between
London and New York which penetrated deeply into university
life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. The American
branch of this 'English Establishment' exerted much of its influence
through five American newspapers (New York Times and Herald
Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post...)
[4.Quigley,
953]
news and
entertainment media,
churches,
etc)
prepared to
lead the masses toward cultural and religious synthesis
in communities and organizations around the world using the
dialectic
process
-- a strategy well tested and proven in the former Soviet
Union. (Many participants -- including
churches -- may never know how their new business practices and
small group dialogues
help undermine traditional values and prepare their members for
the new global society.)
To the pragmatic prophets
and pied pipers behind this scheme, the loss of lives, property and freedom
mattered little, for the utopian
end would justify their
unscrupulous means.
Social experiments that killed millions in Russia, Nazi Germany and China
became useful stepping stones for the wealthy foundations and financiers
in the UK and US who helped fund those wars and revolutions -- and for the
powerful leaders (in the UK and USA) who provided weapons and technology
for both allies and supposed enemies.
Many of our presidents [see
President George W.
Bush] have served as visible
and elected representatives for behind-the-scenes masters who have already
mapped the basic course (if not all the details).
Behind many visible world leaders stand
"wise" insiders
who have been guiding change for decades. Some of their
recent
names are familiar:
George Shultz,
David Rockefeller,
Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger,
Brent Scowcroft....
These men -- in the top echelon of the
Council
of Foreign Relations (CFR) and other elite "clubs" --
serve in presidents' cabinets again and again. Some lead silently behind the scenes. They may call themselves
Republicans or Democrats; it
doesn't really matter.
Few have done more
to expose this revolutionary agenda than
Carrol Quigley, the history professor
at the Foreign Service Schools of Georgetown University whom Clinton honored
in his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention, July 16, 1992.
[See
Quigley's credentials]
In his 1300-page tome, Tragedy and Hope: A
History of the World in Our Time, he wrote:
"The chief problem
of American political life for a long time has been how to make the
two Congressional parties more national and international.
The argument
that the two parties should represent
opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the
other of the Left, is a foolish idea
acceptable only the doctrinaire and academic thinkers.
Instead the two parties should be almost identical,
so the that American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound
or extensive shifts in policy."
[4-Quigley,
1247-1248]
In other words,
elected officials come and go, but the unelected leaders behind the scenes continue their reign. As
European Parliament member Ashley Mote wrote in an article titled
"Beware
the Secret Heart of the EU,"
"Even the EU's public face - the unelected commission - is part of the
charade. Power does not lie with them. It lies with the senior staff
running their departments.... We do not know what their budgets are,
how they are financed, or who approves their costs. Indeed, we do not
even know what powers they have been given, nor by whom. And we cannot
get rid of them....
"The EU would no longer be the servant of the member states. It would
have become their master. Every previous treaty was a small step
along that road.... The other 24 commissioners, each appointed by the
other member states... are figure-heads. They take the flak
in the public arena, and make announcements decided for them by
their senior staff, with the guidance of the secret committees.
"...officially above the commission sits a Council of Ministers....
But the council is just more of the same elaborate illusion....
The European Parliament sits below this vast superstructure... designed
to create an illusion of accountable democracy. A condescending
pat on the head for voters held in contempt.
"...the EU’s parliament has a built-in majority in favour of the social
market. It is the repository of an unspoken agreement between the left
and the multinationals. ... In effect, the left has said to the multinationals:
you can have your markets stitched up for you, if we can indulge ourselves
in endless social engineering. Big business has agreed. The result
is a largely supportive parliament both from the left and right of
the political divide."
[The "Americas"
are moving in the same direction!]
Summarizing a key
point in Quigley's Tragedy and Hope, Dr. Stanley Monteith wrote in
his well researched book, Brotherhood of Darkness: "Professor Quigley
assured his readers that the threat of communism was exaggerated, and that
he had researched the men and the organizations that rule the world. In
those days many people believed that our State Department had turned Eastern
Europe and China over to the communist because our government was dominated
by subversive agents." Professor Quigley
clarified that confusion:
"This myth,
like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist,
and has existed for a generation, an international
Anglophile network which operates,
to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communist act.
In fact, this network, which we may identify as the
Round Table Groups,
has no aversion to
cooperating with
the Communists, or any other groups,
and frequently does so.
I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for
twenty years, and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to
examine its papers and secret records."
[4.Quigley,
950]
"One of Professor Quigley's most shocking revelations,"
wrote Dr. Monteith, "was the fact that the American
Communist Party was partly financed by
J. P. Morgan
and Company.... J. P. Morgan and his associates
financed the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, conservative groups,
liberal organizations, communist groups and anti-communist organizations.
[See the dialectic
process] Thus we should not be surprised to learn that someone purchased
Professor Quigley's publisher and destroyed the plates to the first half
of his book so it couldn't be reprinted."[1,
page 99-100]
The
Council of Foreign Relations
(CFR) would become the U.S.
equivalent to the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)
in Great Britain. Professor Quigley explains:
"At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that
the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks
was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each
dominion, a front organization to the existing local
Round Table Group. This front
organization called the Royal Institute
of International Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the
existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the
Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company....
In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International
Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris."
[4.Quigley,
951-952]
Banks and tax-exempt foundations were essential to this
global vision :
"The
powers
of financial capitalism has another far reaching aim, nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands
able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy
of the world as a whole....
"The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements
in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the
world's central banks which were themselves private corporations.
Each central bank... sought to dominate its government by its ability
to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence
the level of economic activity in the country, and to
influence
cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards...."[4.Quigley,
324]
"In 1924, the chairman of the board of the Midland Bank said,
"...banks can and do create money... And they who control the credit
of the nation direct the policy of Government and hold in the hollow
of their hands the destiny of the people."[4.Quigley,
325]
"During the early decades of the 20th century," explained
Dr. Monteith, "the three largest banks in the US were owned by the Rockefellers,
the Morgan's, and the Mellon's." Contrary to popular speculations, the powerful
European central banks preceded the House of Rothschild. Jewish banks "never
controlled the financial institutions of the world."
[1, page 35] Quigley, 50-62
There you have a
glimpse into the hidden Anglo-American power structure and its European
branches. To see how all the pieces fit together, we suggest you read
Brotherhood
of Darkness
[800-544-8927] by Dr. Stan Monteith.
Many of the quotes below are taken (with permission) from his book.
1842.
Alfred Lord Tennyson penned the poem, Locksley Hall, expressing his
belief that "Great Britain had a moral obligation to consolidate the world
under British rule.[1,
page 12]
1870s.
Oxford professor John Ruskin embraced Tennyson's vision with students,
persuading them that "they had a moral obligation to disseminate English
culture and unite the world under British rule.[1,
page 14] By early 1900s, many
held strategic positions in the English Government, but none of his disciples
would further the vision more effectively than
Cecil Rhodes.
1877.
In his book, Confession of Faith, Cecil Rhodes wrote: "
The
Society [of
the Elect] 'should inspire
and even own
portions of the press for the press rules the mind of the people.
The Society should always be searching for members who might by their position
in the world by their energies or character forward the object…"[Cecil
Rhodes: Confessions of Faith]
1888.
Edward Bellamy also embraced Tennyson's vision, and his book,
Looking Backward, helped spread the vision of a socialist world government.[1,
page 15] Bellamy clubs began forming across the
USA. Among his followers was Andrew Carnegie who believe in monopoly
capitalism -- socialism (a universal welfare system) with a ruling
class of powerful capitalists who would control both governments and the
people.[1,
page 16]
189
0
(Autumn): "Rhodes
sent his close friend W. T. Stead
a letter explaining his plan for world government:
The key of my idea discussed
with you is a Society, copied from the Jesuits as to organization...
an idea which ultimately (leads) to the cessation of all wars and
one language throughout the world....
The only thing feasible to carry
this idea out is a secret one
[society] gradually absorbing
the wealth of the world
to be devoted to such an object."[6,
page 13]
"Rhodes’ 'universal peace' would
begin,
according to him, 'after
one hundred years,'
and it will be exactly one hundred years later in the autumn of 1990 that
President George Bush will spell out his “New World Order” concept for
universal peace and cooperation."[6-Cuddy,
p.13] According
to Dr. Cuddy, Rhodes’ letter would be "published in W. T Stead’s article
in Review of Reviews (May 1902)."
Looking back many years later,
Professor Quigley described another step
toward completion of this 100-year plan. Many of these men would undoubtedly
be Rhodes
Scholars:
"after thirty years there would be 'between
two and three thousand men in
the prime of life scattered all
over the world, each one of whom,
moreover, would have been specially-- mathematically --
selected
toward the Founder’s purposes.” [Quigley quoting Stead].[6-Cuddy,
p.14]
1891
(February 5): "Rhodes’
secret society, 'The Society of the Elect,' is formally established....
Rhodes is the 'General,' with Stead, Milner, and Reginald Baliol Brett (Lord
Esher) forming the executive committee. They were followed by the 'Circle
of Initiates,' with an 'Association of Helpers' (later organized by Milner
as the semi-secret Round Table Groups)
beyond them."[6,
page 14]
1895:
The Fabian Socialists
establish the London School of Economics. Though the Fabians are dominated
by an intellectual elite, and The Group [Rhodes' Round Table members]
is dominated by a financial elite, they both believe in a socialist relationship
between government and the masses...."[6, page 14-15]
1891:
To select and train world leaders worthy of his vision, Cecil Rhodes
established the Rhodes Trust and the Rhodes Scholarship Fund.
He had acquired the wealth needed to pursue his global ambitions in the
gold and diamond mines of southern Africa.
The power and influence
of Rhodes Scholars who have pursued their sponsor's vision has, through
the last century helped steer "progress" toward global governance. Dr. Monteith
wrote:
"During the past century
over 4600 young men have been sent to Oxford University where they were
indoctrinated in socialism and world government. President Bill
Clinton, General Wesley Clark, Strobe Talbot, Senator
Bill Bradley and thousands of other prominent men are Rhodes
Scholars. They work in government offices, in international
banks, on the board of corporations, in tax-exempt
foundation, in the
Supreme Court, in the media, in
our universities in the United Nations Association, and
in the Council on Foreign Relations."[1,
page 22]
1902.
Cecil Rhodes died, and Lord Alfred Milner took control of the Rhodes Trust.
1909.
Lord Milner's secretive Round Table Group was established. Professor
Quigley exposed some of the evolving ties between the global banking fraternity
and these evolving "semi-secret discussion
and lobbying groups," which helped
foment World War I as a means to raise public support for a League of
Nations.
"By 1915, Round Table Groups
existed in seven countries, including England...(and) the United States....
Since 1925, there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals,
and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking
fraternity, especially... organizations associated with J. P. Morgan,
the Rockefeller and Whitney families...." Quigley, 950-951.
1913
(January). President Woodrow Wilson wrote in his book, The New
Freedom: "We are in a new world.... In the new order, government
and business must be associated closely.... We stand in the presence
of a revolution.... (which) will come in peaceful guise...."
He continued with this amazing revelation. Remember, this was happening
almost a century ago! What we see today is the result of this hidden but
rising iceberg:
"Some of the
biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing,
are
afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.
They know that there is a power
somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete,
so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath
when they speak in condemnation of it.
. . . We
have been dreading all along the time when the
combined power of high finance
would be greater than the power of government....
"We have come to be one of the worst
ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments
in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer
a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government
by the opinion and
duress of small groups of dominant men.... We are in a new world....
Behind the
whole subject, of course, is the truth that, in the new order, government
and business must be associated closely.... We stand in the presence
of a revolution... (which) will come in peaceful guise."[6-Cuddy,
pps.24-25]
1913
(December 23): President Wilson signed the
Federal Reserve Act. "One of the individuals
who helped to plan the Federal Reserve is Frank Vanderlip, president of
Rockefeller’s National City Bank."[6-Cuddy,
p.25]
1915.
According to the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate
Tax-Exempt Foundations), which would later investigate tax-exempt foundations
that funded communist organizations and their international goals, the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace launched a propaganda
program in 1915 to persuade the American people to fight in World War 1.
During these investigations in the 1950s, the Congressional Committee found
that:
-
Many of our large foundations were actively
promoting communism and socialism
-
The foundations influenced State Department
policy and were largely responsible for bringing communism to China.
-
The foundations were working to undermine
our constitutional form of government.
In the official minutes of the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Reece Committee also
found the following specific questions which were discussed by the Carnegie
trustee:
"Is there any means known to man more effective
than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?'"
"How do we involve the United States in
a war?"
"How do we control the diplomatic machinery
of the United States?" [Their conclusion: "We" must control the State
Department][5]
1917.
Dr. Monteith wrote that "J. P. Morgan and his associates controlled twenty
five of our most influential newspapers. The atrocity stories [about the
war] were designed to raise public support of American entry into World
War 1" -- an essential step toward public acceptance of a world government.
According to the Congressional Record
(2-17-1917),
"...the
J.P. Morgan
[banking] interests.... and their subsidiary organizations got together
12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the
most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number
of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the US....
They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25
of the greatest papers. ... an editor was furnished for each
paper to properly supervise and edit information...."[1,
page 9]
1917 (11-28).
After Lenin's triumph in Russia, Colonel Mandel House, President
Woodrow Wilson's main advisor and -- as President Wilson called him, "my
altar ego" -- cabled the president the following message from Paris: "There
have been cabled over and published here statements made by American
papers to the effect that Russia should be treated as an enemy. It is
exceedingly important that such criticism should be suppressed."[6-Cuddy,
p.32]
According to
Dr. Dennis Cuddy, Col. House was "the man primarily responsible for
the League of Nations Covenant (influenced by the Fabian Socialists'
drafts for the League), would also be largely responsible for the establishment
of the Council on Foreign Relations. In June, 1923, he wrote in its
Foreign Affairs journal:
"If war had not come
in 1914 in fierce and exaggerated form, the idea of an association of
nations would probably have remained dormant, for great reforms
seldom materialize except through great upheavals.... If law and
order are good within states, there can be no reasons why they should
not be good between states [nations]."[6-Cuddy,
p.30]
1917.
In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House
Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the
official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace:
"These trustees in a meeting about
1917
had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of
their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated
it... could alter life in this country.
... they even had the brashness
to ... dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that
the war did not end too quickly....
"The concern became,
as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion
to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914
. And they came
to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion,
they must control education.
And then they approached the
Rockefeller Foundation and they
said: 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it
involves subjects that are domestic in their significance?' And it was
agreed. Then together they decided that the
key to it was the
teaching of American history and they must change that."
[7]
1918.
"Russia is pointing the way to a great and sweeping world changes.
It is not in Russia alone that the old order is passing . There is a lot
of the old order in America, and that is going, too.... I am glad it is
so." William Boyce Thompson, Federal Reserve Bank director and founding
member of the Council on Foreign Relations wrote these words in the
January issue of New York World.[10, p. 10]
1918
(August 7). Financier Bernard Baruch, chairman of the War Industries Board
(who in 1944 advised President Roosevelt concerning "War and Postwar
Plans"), said:
"Every man's life is at
the call of the nation and so must be every man's property. We are
living today in a highly organized state of socialism. The state
is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the
welfare of the state. His property is only as the state does not need
it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state."
[6-Cuddy,
p.32]
1919
(February). The League of Nations. "The terrible losses of
World War 1 produced... an ever growing public demand that some method be
found to prevent the renewal of the suffering and destruction which were
now seen to be an inescapable part of modern war. So great was the force
of this demand that within a few weeks after the opening of the peace
conference of Paris in January 1919, unanimous agreement had been
reached on the text of the covenant of the League of Nations."
Brit-13-851 Col. House
wrote the first draft
of that covenant.
1919.
Col. House deliberately misled world leaders into rejecting any notion of
blocking the Bolshevik Revolution. The following statement is from his diary:
"I had a heart to heart talk with Clemenceau [Premier of France] about Bolshevism
in Russia and its westward march. I made him confess that military interventions
was impossible.... Later in the afternoon, when Orlando [Premier of Italy]
called, I gave him very much the same kind of talk.... I am trying, and
have partially to succeeded, to frighten not only the President [Wilson]
but the English, French and Italians regarding what might be termed 'the
Russian peril.'"[6-Cuddy,
p.34-35]
1921.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded -- mainly through
Col. House's influence. To build the needed network of globalist
support groups, it would disperse tens of millions of dollars annually from
the major tax-exempt foundations such as the Carnegie and Rockefeller
foundations. Global Tyranny, page
54
The
CFR would be the U.S. equivalent of the British
RIIA, the
Royal Institute of International Affairs. As Professor Quigley
wrote,
"...the original plans for
the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council
on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." Quigley, 952.
1922.
New York city Mayor John Hylan's description of the shadow government developing
on the national level fits the international transformation as well:
"the real menace of our
republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls
its slimy length over city, State and nation. Like the octopus of real
life, it operates under cover of self-created screen. It seizes in its
long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative
bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers and every agency created
for the public protection."[8]
1925.
The International Bureau of Education was founded with a grant from
the Rockefeller Foundation. It later became part of UNESCO.
1931
(November). Arnold Toynbee delivers a speech to the institute for
the Study of the International Affairs at Copenhagen in which he
explains,
"We are at present working
discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force
called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of
the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we
are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the
local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which as statesman
or publicist can... be ostracized or discredited." [The Trend of International Affairs Since
the War," International Affairs, Journal of the Royal Institute
of International Affairs.]
[6-Cuddy, p.50]
1932.
Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason tells trustees
that "The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the
rationalization
of social control... the control of human behavior."[8,
p.18]
1932.
Dr. Ernst Rudin, the Nazi director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute
for Psychiatry (funded by "Rockefeller) was appointed president of
the global Eugenics Federation.
1934
(February). A Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division
heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can
hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"
Cuddy, 18.
1935. The Masonic symbol of the eye in the pyramid
is officially added to the U.S. dollar bill. Henry A. Wallace, President
Roosevelt's Secretary of Agriculture (a Socialist and Theosophist who later
became Roosevelt's vice-president) explained:
"Roosevelt as he looked at the colored reproduction
of the Seal was first struck with the representation of the 'All
Seeing Eye,' a Masonic representation of The Great Architect of the
Universe.... Roosevelt like myself was a 32nd degree Mason.
He suggested that the Seal be put on the dollar bill." Henry
A. Wallace, Socialist Sec. of Agriculture and, later, Vice President
under Roosevelt."
[more]
1935.
In a report presented at the 72nd annual NEA meeting, Willard Givens (later
NEA executive secretary) wrote: "A dying laissez-faire must be completely
destroyed and all of us... must be subjected to a large degree
of social control. .. The major function of the school is the social
orientation of the individual. It must seek to give him understanding of
the transition to a new social order."[9]
1937.
John Foster Dulles, former (?) chairman of the Rockefeller foundation and
of the executive committee of the Federal Council of Churches (replaced
by the National Council of Churches) praised totalitarianism saying:
"...Communism and Fascism
[are] changing almost overnight the characteristics of entire peoples.
Millions of individuals have been made into different and, on the whole,
finer people...personal prides (individualism) ... (is) replaced
by ... self-sacrifice and discipline. There is a conscious subordination
of self to the end that some great objective maybe furthered."
(Religion in Life, Vol. 6 No. p.197)
1939.
Future Secretary of State John Foster Dulles (CFR member) delivers
a speech to YMCA. He states, "[There must be] some dilution of
sovereignty, to the immediate disadvantage of those nations which now
possess the preponderance of power...."
(New
York Times, 10-29)
19
41
(January 6). In his speech to a Joint Session of Congress, President
Franklin D.
Roosevelt said, "Since the beginning of our American history we have
been engaged in change – in a perpetual peaceful revolution – a revolution
which goes on steadily, quietly adjusting itself to changing conditions....
The 'World Order' which we seek is the co-operation of free countries,
working together in a friendly, civilized society.... Freedom means
the supremacy of human rights everywhere."
http://www.greatseal.com/mottoes/neworderFDR.html
1941.
The
Declaration
of the United Nations was signed by 26 states. It would help lay the
foundation for the envisioned global reign. Few realized the very real
conspiracy behind World War II -- a stepping stone to the planned future.
[See
Trusting God as Freedom Fades]
1942
(February or March)
"...six years before the
World Council of Churches was formally
launched, its organizers within the
Federal Council of Churches
[renamed National Council of Churches]
held a National Study conference at Wesleyan University in Ohio.
Among the 30 delegates were 15 bishops, seven seminary presidents, and eight
college and university presidents.
John Foster Dulles, who later became Secretary of State in the Eisenhower
administration, chaired the conference. As head of the Federal Council's
inter-Church “Commission to Study the Bases of a Just and Durable Peace,”
Dulles submitted the conference report. It recommended:
-
"a world government of delegated powers
-
"immediate limitations on national sovereignty
-
"international control of all armies and navies
-
"a universal system of money
-
"worldwide freedom of immigration
-
"a democratically controlled international bank
-
"even distribution of the world’s natural wealth."[11]
1942
(March 16) Time magazine
wrote a summary of the report. In its statement below, notice these words:
“a new order... through voluntary cooperation within the framework of democracy
or through explosive political revolution.” This solution, “voluntary cooperation
within the framework of democracy” gives us a glimpse of the true meaning of
nice-sounding words such as democracy, volunteerism, participation (involving
everyone in the consensus process), partnerships, and civil society:
“Some of the conference’s economic opinions were
almost as sensational as the extreme internationalism of its political program.
It held that a ‘new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative'
– a new order that is sure to come either ‘through voluntary cooperation
within the framework of democracy or through explosive political revolution.’
Without condemning the profit motive as such, it denounced various defects in
the profit system for breeding war, demagogues and dictators…. Instead, 'the
church must demand economic arrangements measured by human welfare
."[9]
1942. The editor of the
NEA Journal, J. Elmer Morgan,
wrote an editorial titled "The United Peoples of the World." In it, he explained
a world government's need for an educational branch, a world system of
money and credit, a world police force, 'a world bill of rights and duties.'"
(December 1942).
1943.
John Foster Dulles -- together with leaders such as
Alger Hiss
(exposed by the FBI in 1939 as Communist spy) -- convened another
Council of Churches
conference. It endorsed “Six Pillars of
Peace,” a plea for a world political organization – a United Nations.
In his speech, recorded in the Council’s 1944 Biannual Report, Dulles said,
"Interest
in this subject had been enormously increased by the declaration of the
Moscow conference, which stressed the necessity of creating at the earliest
possible moment a general international organization…. People in and
out of the churches were urged to 'remain united and vigorous to achieve
such [an] international organization.' … This statement, signed
by more than 1,000 Protestant leaders, was given to the press
and mailed to the President and members of Congress.”[9]
1944
(8/21-10/7): "The formation of an international
organization to supersede the League of Nations was also undertaken by
technical experts of the Allied nations. In the United States, numerous state
department and interdepartmental committees studied the intricate problems of
organization, membership, voting procedure and sanctions.... At
Dumbarton
Oaks, Washington, DC, U.S., British, Russian and Chinese
experts [which included co-author Alger Hiss] finally gathered
to draw up a charter for the United Nations organizations. ... the experts were able to reach agreement on all but two issues....
[1] whether a
permanent member of the Security council should be able to employ the veto in
a case in which it was a party....
[2] whether the 16 Soviet
republics should enjoy individual membership. These two issues had to be resolved
by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin at their conference at Yalta."
[Encyclopedia
Britannica, Vol. 23, p.806]
1944.
President Roosevelt chose
Alger Hiss
as his acting director of the State Department's Office of Special Political
Affairs in charge of all postwar planning -- ignoring all the FBI evidence
of his Communist activities.
1945
(2/4-2/11): The Yalta conference -- Churchill,
Roosevelt and Stalin met to discuss post-war resolutions. Alger Hiss
accompanied Roosevelt as his advisor. Roosevelt continued to ignore the FBI
warnings about Hiss
".. In addition
to immediate military and political problems, the conferees discussed the
United Nations organization charter that had recently been drafted a Dumbarton
Oaks. A compromise formula to govern voting in the Security Council was found
acceptable...." [Encyclopedia
Britannica, Vol. 23, p.807]
1945
(April 1, San Francisco):
Alger Hiss,
who coauthored the UN charter,
served as Secretary General of the United Nations organizing conference.
Later, John Foster Dulles recommend that
Hiss head up the multimillion dollar Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace.
"Upon the basis of
proposals submitted by China, the USSR, the UK and the US, the United Nations
Conference on International Organization (UNCIO), which convened at San
Francisco, CA, drafted the Charter of the United Nations. It was
signed on June 26 and entered into force on October 24, 1945.
"The San Francisco conference
was attended by representatives of the 46 states that had signed the Declaration
of the United Nations. Four other states (Ukraine, Belarusian, Argentina and
Denmark) were admitted during the conference....
"The Dumbarton Oaks proposals,
certain Chinese proposals later adopted by the Big Four (US, UK, USSR and China)
and the Yalta agreement.... provided the agenda of the conference.
"The international
Secretariat
provided interpreters and translators and distributed documents and speeches
daily in t he five official languages (English, French, Spanish, Russian and
Chinese). The chairmanship of the plenary sessions rotated among the Big Four.
...
"The Charter which emerged
from the conference followed the general lines of the Dumbarton Oaks proposals
but gave greater weight to the General Assembly."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 22, p.556]
1945
(April 16): Time magazine gave
a preview of the international conference: "As Secretary-general, managing the
agenda, he [Alger Hiss]
will have a lot to say behind the scenes about who gets the breaks."
1945
(June 26): After decades of plans, propaganda
and political and financial manipulation, the United Nations was officially
launched with Alger
Hiss as its first Secretary-General.
Representatives from 50 nations met in San Francisco to sign the UN Charter.
On June 28, President Harry Truman stated, "We are going to have to
ratify this (UN) Constitution of San Francisco.... It will be just
as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for
us to get along in the republic of the United States."
For much of his life, Harry
Truman carried the poem, Locksley Hall, by Lord Tennyson in his
pocket. Remember its sobering words:
"Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the
battle-flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world."
1945.
UNESCO, a specialized UN agency headquartered in Paris,
was established "to contribute to world peace by promoting international
cooperation in education, science and culture. It's first Director-General,
Julian Huxley, wrote in his book, UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:
"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be
a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary
in background... In its education program it can... familiarize all peoples
with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate
nations to a world organization.... Tasks for the media division
of UNESCO [will be] to promote the growth of a common outlook shared
by all nations and cultures... to help the emergence of a single
world culture." See more
at
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htm
1946.
In his NEA
editorial, "The
teacher and World Government," J. Elmer Morgan, wrote, "In the struggle
to establish an adequate world government, the teacher... can do much to prepare
the hearts and minds of children.... At the very top of all the agencies
which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the
teacher, and the organized profession." [The
NEA Journal (January 1946)]
http://www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/cuddy-nwo.htm
1946.
The
NEA printed "National Education in an International World"
(Teacher's College): The establishment of [UNESCO] marks the culmination of
the a movement for the creation of an international agency of education....
Nations that become members of UNESCO accordingly assume an obligation to
revise the textbooks used in their schools.... Each member nation...
has a duty to se to it that nothing its it curriculum... is contrary to UNESCO's
aims."
1946.
An
NEA-sponsored "World Conference of the Teaching Profession"
drafted a Constitution for a World Organization of the Teaching Profession.
It would be "a mighty force in aiding UNESCO" said William Carr (associate
secretary of NEA's Education Policies Commission).[7,p.24]
1946.
The United States joined UNESCO, a UN agency. According to Charlotte
Iserbyt, "this legislation was accompanied by President Harry Truman's remarkable
statement: 'Education must establish the moral unity of mankind.' Truman's
recommendation was bolstered by General Brock Chisholm, who would become
the first
director-general
of World Health Organization (WHO),
a UN specialized
agency."[10, p.28]
1946.
Dr. Chisholm presented
a paper entitled The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress
at a US conference on mental health. It was published by the (now prestigious)
magazine Psychiatry, and by his Communist friend,
Alger Hiss,
the publisher of the socialist magazine International Conciliation. Hiss,
then president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote
the Preface to Chisholm's paper. Ponder Dr. Chisholm's words:
"The responsibility for charting
the necessary changes in human behavior rests clearly on the sciences
working in that field. Psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists, economists,
and politicians must face this responsibility....
"Can we identify the reasons why we fight
wars...? Many of them are easy to list --prejudice, isolationism, the ability
to emotionally and uncritically to believe unreasonable things....
"The only psychological
force capable of producing these perversions is morality, the concept of
right and wrong...
For many generations we have
bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction of sin. We have swallowed
all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday
and day school teachers....
"...it
has long been generally accepted that parents have perfect right to impose
any points of view, any lies or fears, superstitions, prejudices, hates,
or faith on their defenseless children. It is, however, only recently that
it has become a matter of certain knowledge that these things cause neuroses,
behavior disorders, emotional disabilities, and failure to develop to a
state of emotional maturity which fits one to be a citizen of a democracy....
"Surely the training
of children in home and schools should be of at least as great public concern
as their vaccination for their own protection....
Individuals who have emotional disabilities
of their own, guilts, fears, inferiorities, are certain to project their
hates on to others... They are a very real menace... Whatever the cost,
we must learn to live in friendliness and peace with... all the people in
the world...."
"There is something to be said... for gently putting aside the mistaken
old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done gently,
it may have to be done roughly or even violently....
"Can such a program
of re-education... be charted?"
See a longer excerpt
at
www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/chisholm.htm
1948.
The World Health Organization
(WHO) is established under the
leadership of Dr. Brock Chisholm,
its first director-general.
1948.
The UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
a legally binding contract for all nations who, like the U.S. ratified it. It
sounds good, as do all the intrusive UN human rights treaties.
Article 18 upholds "the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."
Article 19 affirms "the right to freedom of opinion and expression...
and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and
regardless of frontiers." But Article 29 states that "these rights
and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations."
In other words, these "rights"
or "freedoms" don't apply to those who would criticize the UN or its policies.
Your rights would be conditioned on your compliance. Only if your message supports
official ideology are you free to speak it. As Andrei Vishinsky wrote in The Law of the Soviet State, "There can be no place for freedom of speech,
press, and so on for the foes of socialism."
[Encyclopedia Britannica (1968), Volume V, page
164.]
1949.
The
UNESCO textbook
titled Toward World Understanding stated,
"As long as the child breathes the poisoned air
of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only rather precarious
results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the
child with extreme nationalism."
1953.
During the Reece Committee investigations, Ford Foundation president H. Rowan
Gaither made the following admission to Norman Dodd, staff director of the hearings:
"....you know that we at the executive level
here were, at one time or another, active in either the OSS, the State Department,
or the European Economic Administration. During those times... we operated
under directives issued by the White House. We are continuing to be
guided by just such directives.... The substance [of these directives] was
to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the Unites
States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union."[5]
William H. McIlhany, II, The Tax Exempt Foundations (1980),
page 63.
1966.
Quigley's Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time was published.
Summarizing a key point in the book, Dr. Monteith wrote, "Professor Quigley
assured his readers that the threat of communism was exaggerated, and that he
had researched the men and the organizations that rule the world., In those
days many people believed that our State Department had turned Easter Europe
and china over to the communist because our government was dominated by subversive
agents. Professor Quigley ridiculed that idea:
"This myth, like all fables, does in fact have
a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation,
an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in t
he way the radical Right believes the Communist act. In fact, this network,
which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating
with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know
of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years,
and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers
and secret records."
1960s.
Dr. Robert Muller, U.N. deputy secretary-general, prepared a "World Core Curriculum"
with the following goal: "Assisting the child in becoming an integrated individual
who can deal with personal experience while seeing himself as a part of 'the
greater whole.' In other words, promote growth of the group idea, so that
group good, group understanding, group interrelations and group goodwill replace
all limited, self-centered objectives, leading to group consciousness."
1969
(March 27). "President Richard Nixon divided
the country into 10 regions via the Government Reorganization Act. Then with
Nixon’s Executive Order 11647, the nation was divided up into 10 administrative
regions on February 14,
1972
(Federal Register February 12, 1972, Vol. 37, No. 30), which also established
the Federal Regional Council for the newly designed 10 regions." Nixon "did
so because the United Nations passed a
resolution that the United States must reorganize into 10 regions."
(Nancy
Levant, "Bankrupted
States=Con-Con & Newstate Constitution")
1973.
The Trilateral Commission was established, primarily by David Rockefeller
(chairman of the Rockefeller controlled Chase Manhattan Bank) who funded it.
He had been inspired by a proposal by Zbigniew Brzezinski, a global-minded Professor
at Columbia University who suggested a three-fold partnership between Western
Europe, North America (US and Canada) and Japan.
Its US membership would include Brzezinski;
former president George H. Bush; Richard
Gardner (Columbia University); Alan
Greenspan (Federal Reserve); Samuel Johnson
(Johnson & Son Inc); Robert McNamara (former
president of the World Bank); Brent Scowcroft;
Donna Shalala (Chancellor, U. of Wisconsin
and Clinton's Sec. of DHHS); Albert Shanker
(Pres. of American Federation of Teachers); Strobe
Talbott (Editor-at-large, Time);
Lester Thurow (Faculty, MIT); Paul
Volcker (Faculty, Princeton University).
1973.
After a trip to China, David Rockefeller praised Mao Tse-tung who had
slaughtered over 40 million people. His report, "From a China Traveler," highlights
the goals presented in UN reports such as "The Commission on Global Governance"
and UNESCO's "Our Creative Diversity." Both focus on lofty ideals such
as peace, harmony and unity in the communitarian "global" village
-- a vision that demands absolute control and universal participation in facilitated
small groups (modeled by the hierarchy of "soviets" or councils in Communist
lands):
"One is impressed immediately by the sense of
national harmony.... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution
it has obviously succeeded .... in fostering high morale and community
purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The
enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly form the singleness
of ideology and purpose.... The social experiment in China under
Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in
history." New York Times, 8-10-1973.
1974.
In his book, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton
"documented the fact that Rockefeller and Morgan banks provided the Bolsheviks
with loans, while American industry provided them with the plants and the technology
thy needed. Westinghouse, Henry Ford, Averill Harriman, Armand Hammer, Exxon,
and other American firms built the infrastructure that allowed the Soviet Union
to survive."[1,
page 71]
1983.
Speaking at Annapolis, Navy Secretary John Lehman told the graduating class
that, "Within weeks, many of you will be looking across just hundreds of feet
of water at some of the most modern technology ever invented in America. Unfortunately,
it is on Soviet ships." [1, page 71]
#107
1991
(May
21).
"In an address to the
Bilderberg organization meeting at Evian, France,
Henry
Kissinger said,
"Today Americans would
be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow
they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was
an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened
our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge
with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man
fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenarios, individual rights
will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted
to them by their world government."
(Transcribed from a tape recording made
by one of the Swiss delegates)
2012.
London Olympics closing ceremony.
(Personal note by Berit) This
dark but spectacular celebration was recorded on a video that we posted for a
few days. But, due to its occult themes and suggestions, we deleted it.
Among its images are the occult symbols of today's elitist secret societies -- which are
ominously real and powerful. I can personally verify that the OTO,
high-level "illuminated" Freemasons, and the
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn are real! (Berit)
“If
God is for us, who can be against us?
... It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is
even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us.
"Who shall
separate us from the love of Christ?
Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness,
or peril, or sword? ... Yet in all these things we are more than
conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that
neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers,
nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor
any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love
of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Romans 8:31-39
|
Endnotes
1. Stanley
Monteith, MD, Brotherhood of Darkness (Oklahoma City: Hearthstone Publishing,
2000).
2. This list of
UN Under-Secretaries for Political and Security
Council Affairs is missing the last decade.
A futile search on the UN website reminded me that the UN is not "of
the people or for the people." Its version of a Bill or Rights is conditioned
on absolute compliance with UN ideology, and -- unlike the U.S.-- it has no
"Freedom of Information Act."
1946-49 Arkady Sobolev (USSR)
1949-53 Constantine Zinchenko (USSR)
1953-54 Iiya Tcherychev (USSR)
1945-57 Dragoslav Protitich (Yugoslavia)
1957-60 Anatoly Dorynin (USSR)
1960-62 George Arkadev (USSR)
1962-63 E.D. Kiselev (USSR)
1963-65 V.P. Suslov (USSR)
1965-68 Alexei E. Nesterenko (USSR)
1968-73 Leonid N. Kutakov (USSR)
1973-78 Arkady N. Shevchenko (USSR)
1978-81 Mikhail D. Sytenko (USSR)
1981-86 Viacheslav A. Ustinov (USSR)
1987-92 Vasiliy S. Safronchuk (USSR)
1992- Vladimir Petrovsky
(Russia, former USSR)
3. Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy
(Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher, 1980), pages 23-24
4.
Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and
Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (New York: The MacMillan Company,
1966).
5. William H. McIlhany, II,
The Tax-Exempt Foundations (Westport, CT: Arlington House,
1980), 60.
6.
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.,
Secret Records Revealed (Oklahoma City: Heartstone Publishing,
1994), pages 30, 32.
7.
Norman Dodd reported these findings in an interview with the writer, William
H. McIlihany II, for his 1980 book, The Tax Exempt Foundations (Arlington
House, Westport, USA), p. 60-61. The Special House Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt
Foundations reported in 1954. It was named after its chairman, Representative,
B. Carrol Reece of Tennessee.
8. Dennis L. Cuddy,
Ph.D., Chronology of Education with Quotable Quotes (Pro Family Forum, Highland
City, FL 33846, 1994); page 13, 18, 24.
9. Dennis
L. Cuddy, Ph.D., "Mental Health, Education and Social Control," September 2004,
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/006/cuddy/mental_health-2.htm
10. Charlotte
Iserbyt, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America (Ravenna, OH: Conscience
Press, 1999).
11.
Edgar C. Bundy, Collectivism in the Church (1958), 165, 91. See
"Conforming
the Church to the New Millennium."
Additional Notes: Manly P. Hall explained the meaning behind the
Great Seal (see picture at top of page) and linked
its unfinished pyramid to the unfolding world history: "On the reverse of our
nation's Great Seal is an unfinished pyramid to represent human society itself,
imperfect and incomplete. Above floats the symbol of the esoteric orders, the
radiant triangle with its all-seeing eye." For more information, see
http://www.greatseal.com/levels/fdr1935.html
"CARROLL QUIGLEY,
professor of history at the Foreign Service School of Georgetown University,
formerly taught at Princeton and at Harvard. He has done research in the
archives of France, Italy, and England, and is the author of the widely
praised Evolution
of Civilizations.... He is a member of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, the American Anthropological Association, and the American
Economic Association, as well as various historical associations. He has been lecturer on Russian history
at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces since 1951 and on Africa at the
Brookings Institution since 1961, and has lectured at many other places, including
the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Foreign Service Institute of the State
Department, and the Naval College at Norfolk, Virginia. In 1958 he was a consultant
to the Congressional Select Committee which set up the present national space
agency....
"TRAGEDY AND HOPE
shows
the years 1895—1950 as a period of transition from the world dominated by Europe
in the nineteenth century to the world of three blocs in the twentieth century.
With clarity, perspective, and cumulative impact, Professor Quigley examines
the nature of that transition through two world wars and a worldwide economic
depression. As an interpretative historian, he tries to show each event in the
full complexity of its historical context. The result is a unique work, notable
in several ways. It gives a picture of the world in terms of the influence of
different cultures and outlooks upon each other; it shows, more completely than
in any similar work, the influence of science and technology on human life;
and it explains, with unprecedented clarity, how the intricate financial and
commercial patterns of the West prior to 1914 influenced the development of
today’s world." [from the jacket of Tragedy and Hope]
Home
| Brave New Schools |
Articles |
Charts |
Victory
See also
The Revolutionary Roots of the UN
Steps toward Global
Mind Control
Trusting
God as Freedom Fades
Re-Inventing
the World |
Real Conspiracies
