Q & A Index

Issues 

Lack of time caused us to stop posting your questions long time ago.

We will try to do better in the future.

 

New May 3

 

Home | News Index | Preparing for Victory | Cultural Christianity | The Triumph of the Cross

Email this page


 

Question: Please clarify your position on Gershon Saloman's [sp] rebuilding the third temple project or any other man, whether Jew or Gentile.

 

Answer: Since Jesus Christ, my Lord, became the ultimate sacrifice for sins, there is no need for the old temple designed for daily sacrifices for sins. While some may build it for traditional reasons, it would no longer serve its old purpose. His death included atonement for the Jews as well as the gentiles. (See Ephesians 2)

 That doesn’t mean the temple won’t be built for other reasons. But it is no longer of great significance, so I have not been following the trends in that area.

 “He does not need to offer sacrifices every day like the other high priests. They did this for their own sins first and then for the sins of the people. But Jesus did this once for all when he sacrificed himself on the cross. Those who were high priests under the law of Moses were limited by human weakness. But after the law was given, God appointed his Son with an oath, and his Son has been made perfect forever.”  Heb 7:26


Question: Have you reviewed the book being used in many churches called "The Gospel According to the Simpsons"? I'm not sure if this is the same material used at the university level (your site mentioned this).

I would appreciate any feedback you might have. My church is considering using this for the junior high students.

 

Partial answer (We welcome input those who have read the study): I haven’t read it yet – but I looked it up on Amazon and downloaded five introductory pages. It trivializes both God and His truth. These examples from page 15 in chapter 1 (“Divine Imagery”), apparently help illustrate our arrogant foolishness. But by turning capricious human nature into a string of jokes, they could also prompt students to view sin – even God’s nature – as a joke. When people see what's rude and crude as funny or cool, it is hard to view God’s holiness and almighty power with the seriousness and reverence He deserves. Consider this illustration:

“Predestination makes an appearance from time to time, where God’s plan is used sometimes as an excuse, sometimes as an explanation.

 

“'Until this moment,' says Bart, poised to buy a rare issue of Radioactive Man, 'I never knew why God put me on this earth. But now I know... to buy that comic book.''

“and when he causes a traffic accident, he shouts, 'Act of God, not my fault!'

“Criticized for using bad language, he says, 'Maybe I curse a little, but that’s the way God made me and I’m too old to stop now.'”

The following verses from Ephesians 5:4-11 may help explain one of the reasons why this language, with reference to God, seems inappropriate:

“...neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them.
       "For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light (for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth),  finding out what is acceptable to the Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.”

“The tongue of the wise uses knowledge rightly, but the mouth of fools pours forth foolishness.” Proverbs 15:2

“Let no corrupt word proceed out of your mouth, but what is good for necessary edification, that it may impart grace to the hearers. And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.”


Home | Q & A Index