This is why the CSIS Project has "an
emphasis on regional integration." (Brzezinski also
described the regions that would be formed, that Israel
and the Palestinians would be part of a Middle Eastern
region, how Communist China would be brought into an
Asian region, and that Iran would be part of a Central
Asian region which would have important oil and gas
pipelines constructed.)
At this point, it is worth remembering
that in Stalin's January 1913 address in Vienna, he
advocated national loyalties becoming subservient to
regions. And 3 years later, Lenin in 1916
proclaimed:
"The aim of socialism is not only to
abolish the present division of mankind into smaller
states and all-national isolation, not only to
bring the nations closer to each other, but also
to merge them."
You may recall that in Brzezinski's
BETWEEN TWO AGES (1970), he praised Marxism, and he
claimed that "the nation-state is gradually yielding
its sovereignty." One aspect of American sovereignty
that is being yielded is ownership of American companies
by Americans. In the first 9 months of 2007, 69
companies in New England alone have been sold to foreign
buyers. Nationally, the French company Alcatel bought
Lucent Technologies in the U.S. last year, and in
September 2007 announced it will be cutting thousands of
jobs.
Relevant to this, Alan Tonelson
(research fellow at the U.S. Business and Industry
Council) said foreign companies are "acquiring control
over the most dynamic pieces of the American economy,
and they're acquiring control over America's future."
Also relevant to this was the assessment by Donald
Klepper-Smith (chief economist at DataCore Partners)
regarding decisions made overseas and how they would
effect American workers. He opined: "It raises some red
flags and some real questions about our independence."
Part of the conditioning process to
cause Americans to accept a NAU is the role of past and
present government officials explaining the alleged
economic benefits of such a union. For example, Harry
Roegner in a letter titled "An economic union would be
beneficial" in THE GREENVILLE (South Carolina) SUN
(October 15, 2007) pointed out the large oil reserves of
both Canada and Mexico that would be useful to the U.S.,
as well as Mexico's excess manpower who, as immigrants,
would help support U.S. and Canadian economic growth.
Roegner was an adviser on foreign trade issues to the
U.S. Department of Commerce from 1984 to 1994, and in
his letter said:
"A North American economic union
would provide the free flow of capital and labor
across national borders needed to address many of
the (aforementioned) imbalances."
Often regional economic integration into
some type of union is argued on the basis of free trade.
However, John Fonte (who had an office next to mine at
the U.S. Department of Education) of the Hudson
Institute has explained that the concept of regional
economic arrangements or trading blocs actually is
contrary to free trade to an extent. For example, in a
NAU, there would be trading arrangements among the 3
nations which would limit the ability of the U.S. to
trade freely with nations outside the NAU trading bloc.
But hasn't President Bush recently said
all this talk about a NAU is nonsense? On August 21,
2007 at the concluding press conference for the Security
and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) in Montebello, Quebec,
Fox News reporter Bret Baier asked if the SPP is a
prelude to a NAU similar to the European Union (EU), and
if there are plans to build some kind of superhighway
connecting all 3 countries. President Bush replied:
"If you've been in politics as long
as I have, you get used to that kind of technique
where you lay out a conspiracy and then force people
to try to prove it doesn't exist."
The truth, of course, is that the U.S.,
Canada and Mexico are being connected by 4 Trade
Corridors. On November 20, 2007, Lt. Governor John
Harvard of Manitoba delivered a "Speech From The
Throne," in which he revealed:
"Manitoba has been working with the
Canadian government and state governments in the
U.S. to protect and enhance our access to key trade
markets. In response to U.S. border and security
measures, Manitoba will begin offering an enhanced
driver's license as an affordable and secure form of
identification for travelers. The new license will
be available in the Fall of 2008. Manitoba is
also taking a major role in the development of a
Mid-Continent Trade Corridor, connecting our
northern Port of Churchill with trade markets
throughout the central United States and Mexico. To
advance the concept, an alliance has been built
with business leaders and state and city governments
spanning the entire length of the Corridor. When
fully developed, the trade route will incorporate an
'in-land port' in Winnipeg with pre-clearance for
international shipping."
The SPP is also an important part of the
power elite's plan for a techno-feudal fascist world
government because it is a "partnership." For years, the
American people and their leaders have been conditioned
to accept educational and other partnerships as
solutions to their problems. For example, city
governments strapped for funds are approached by
corporations or their related private foundations with
plans and funds to improve education, which the city
leaders are only too glad to accept. This conditions the
people eventually to accept government/corporate rule.
This is a form of Socialism known as
fascism, and it will be the type of world government
the power elite plans ultimately to bring about and
control. In this government, the power elite will
control politicians who will become government
leaders who will promulgate laws, rules and regulations
favorable to certain transnational corporations
(controlled by the power elite) and unfavorable to any
possible competition to those select corporations.
So why did President Bush ridicule Bret
Baier's question, especially since there are already
47 Mexican Consulates across the U.S.? Lou Dobbs in
his CNN commentary "Beware the Lame Duck" (October 17,
2007) wrote:
"Although many conservatives refuse
to accept the reality, George W. Bush is a one-world
neo-liberal who drove budget and trade deficits to
record heights.... President Bush has pressed
hard for the Security and Prosperity Partnership,
the first step toward a North American Union that
will threaten our sovereignty. The administration
has permitted American businesses to hire illegal
aliens, encouraged the invasion of 12 million to 20
million illegal aliens and has given Mexico and
corporate America dominion over our borders and our
immigration policy....
"The assault on our national
sovereignty continues....The president is urging the
Senate to act favorably on our accession to the U.N.
Convention on the Law of the Sea....The treaty will
submit the United States to international tribunals
largely adverse to our interests, and dispute
resolution mechanisms are stacked against the United
States....The treaty would undermine our national
sovereignty and act as a back door for global
environmental activists to direct U.S. policy."
Fortunately, in Congress, House
Concurrent Resolution 40 states: "Expressing the sense
of Congress that the United States should not engage in
the construction of a North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a
North American Union with Mexico and Canada." ...
Will all Mexican truck drivers be
stopped at the border to see if they can read road signs
in English, if they have criminal backgrounds, and how
long they already have been driving that day (U.S. law
prohibits more than 10 consecutive hours)? I doubt it,
since no more than 2% of Mexican trucks entering the
U.S. today are inspected! Many of these trucks will be a
danger to Americans' safety, and could be used for
smuggling drugs, illegal aliens, and terrorists into the
U.S.
Many countries deliberately release
their criminal elements into the U.S., often coming
across the Mexican border. And if the criminals are
caught, our federal government releases them into
American society if their own countries refuse to take
them back. Our government knows how to solve this
problem (e.g., stop issuing visas to people from those
countries), but has refused to take such action most of
the time. Ask yourself why our government would release
murderers, rapists, arsonists, and other criminals into
our society to commit violent crimes against us....
In terms of what is planned for
Americans relevant to the EU and the Euro, Vicente Fox
on CNN's "Larry King Live" show October 8, 2007
explained that what he and President Bush agreed to "is
a trade union for all the Americas," and he suggested
that eventually there would be a regional currency. He
made similar comments on the "Daily Show" the same day.
Earlier in 2007, Bolivian President Evo Morales proposed
a single currency for all South American nations.
Concerning North American nations, in
June 1991, Dallas Federal Reserve publication no. 9115,
"Free Trade and the Peso" by Darryl McLeod and John
Welch, analyzed the potential for a single North
American currency. In 1999, former Canadian parliament
member Herbert Grubel published "The Case for the Amero:
The Economics and Politics of a North American Union,"
giving 2010 as the possible date for introducing the "amero"
as the new North American currency.... In July 2000,
Vicente Fox had already proposed a North American common
market with a continental monetary policy.
More recently, David Dodge, Governor of
the Bank of Canada, in May 2007 said that a common
currency with the U.S. is definitely possible. What will
happen is the power elite will cause the dollar to be
devalued to the point where Americans reluctantly will
accept the amero. As Bob Chapman in his December 2006
newsletter, INTERNATIONAL FORECASTER, said:
"(The amero) will be presented to
the American public as the administration's solution
for dollar recovery."
On June 14, 2007 BankIntroductions.com
told their clients that in the next 10-20 years, as the
global economy moves toward regional trading blocs, the
amero or "North American Monetary Unit" (NAMU) will be
introduced. The power elite's plan is to form regional
unions with their own currencies and then link them
into a world government with one global currency.
Relevant to this, Reuters reporter Emmanuel Jarry on
October 23, 2007 wrote "Sarkozy (French President) Calls
for Mediterranean Union Launch in 2008." And the
African Union's African Central Bank plans to mint the
"Gold Mandela" as a single African currency by 2010
(the date the NAU is supposed to form).
If you look at the top of the website
for the Single Global Currency Association (SGCA), there
is a quote by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul
Volcker, saying: "A global economy requires a
global currency." The SGCA "is dedicated to the goal
of implementing a single global currency by
2025...managed by a single international central bank."
I have already indicated that on the cover of THE
ECONOMIST (June 9, 1988) is a picture of "The
Phoenix," a global currency suggested for implementation
in 2018.
Whatever the date of the global
currency's introduction, it will be advertised as
facilitating world trade, which the power elite will
control. This will be like in the days of Solomon when
he fortified Gezer, Hazor and Megiddo (the Har, or
Mount, of Megiddo would be called Armageddon). Through
this fortification, he controlled the Via Maris and
world trade, thereby controlling the world of his day.
The power elite today plans to do likewise, but in a
Biblical sense their plan will lead to the Battle of
Armageddon.